Thursday, 20 August: Forty Filers in Tel Aviv - in Three Different Currencies

Forty Israeli companies filed a report on 20 August, and thirty-two of them received a piece of their own. The largest, Shikun and Binui, closed with a pre-tax loss of NIS 38 million and a net profit of NIS 229 million. And behind it all sits a fact that determines how the day should be read: the reports are denominated in three different currencies - shekels, dollars and euros.

By Ilan Abramov7 min read
Thursday, 20 August: Forty Filers in Tel Aviv - in Three Different Currencies
* The cover image was generated with an AI tool and is not a photograph.

This is the summary of the reports filed on Thursday, 20 August 2026.

Errors or inaccuracies are possible. Spotted something that looks wrong? Write to me and I will correct it.

The Fact That Determines How the Day Is Read

Forty filers, and three different currencies.

In shekels37
In dollars2RP Optical, Electra Real Estate
In euros1Kardan N.V.
דובי

And yesterday there were seven dollar filers out of 26. Today, three currencies on the same trading day.

The trap is identical every time: anyone reading several Israeli reports in sequence assumes they are all in the same currency, because they were all filed with the same exchange on the same day.

And that is not true. A dollar figure read as a shekel one is inflated by more than three times; a euro figure, by about four.

And it is not stated in the headline of any report. It sits in the units of measurement inside the structured file.

The Thirty-Two That Received a Piece of Their Own

The quarterThe central point
Shikun and Binui2,292m · net 229mA pre-tax loss, and a net profit after it
G City516m · net 124mA balance sheet of 30.4 billion, a third of the profit to the minority
Shlomo Holdings1,756m · net 103mA balance sheet of 13.9 billion - an importer and a financing arm
IDI Insurancenet 196.7mA 14.7% return on equity in the quarter
Electra Consumer1,823m · net 30mOnly 16% of the gross margin survives
Dalia Energy1,314.1m · net 15.8mFinancing 63%, tax 72.3%
Neto Holdings1,327.6m · net 44.2m55.8% of the profit to the minority
Neto Malinda1,327.6m · net 44.3mExactly the same revenue, 98% to shareholders
Yochananof1,233.4m · net 50.0mThe only one with comparatives - and all of them negative
Generation Capital870.5m · net 636.4mA 98% operating margin - because it is a fund
Victory635.8m · net 10.5mA higher gross margin than Yochananof, half the operating one
IBI479.3m · net 95.7mA third of the profit to the minority
Novolog451.9m · net 0.5mA profit of about a thousandth of turnover
Dimri398.9m · net 63.8m81% of the gross margin survives
Doral Energy323.8m · loss 95.0mAn operating loss, against 52% at Nofar
Elad Software Systems285.5m · net 14.8mAn operating margin identical to One Technologies
Altshuler Shaham Pension217.1m · net 20.7mThe attributable figure larger than net profit
Nofar Energy202.2m · net 16.1mA 52% margin, and a pre-tax loss
Gaon Group198.8m · net 16.2mA report with no unusual lines
Sugat187.8m · net 7.6mLeverage of 1.6 - financing takes a sixth
Analyst171.6m · net 38.3mPre-tax higher than operating
Mer169.3m · net 10.2mA 10.8% tax rate
Holmes Place156.3m · net 9.3mLeverage of 8.8, and mostly leases
Rani Zim83.8m · net 20.2mAn operating profit of 95.6% of revenue
Gilat Telecom71.4m · net 8.4mZero tax in the quarter
Arit Industries56.3m · net 9.7m48.3% of the profit to the minority
Goto55.9m · loss 4.3mAn operating loss of 1.3% - right on the line
Prime Energy35.8m · loss 10.5mFinancing took 2.5 times operating profit
Dorsel13.2m · loss 7.4mFinancing almost equal to all the revenue
RP Optical (USD)30.7m · net 6.9mAn 8.6% tax rate
Electra Real Estate (USD)-3.8m · loss 16.5mA negative revenue line
Kardan N.V. (EUR)2.9m · loss 62.3mNegative equity of 239.6 million

And Eight That Appear Here Only

Seven of them filed in the afternoon, and one - IDI Issuance - is a debt-raising vehicle with a balance sheet of NIS 505.8 million against negative equity of NIS 852 thousand.

NIS millionsRevenueOperatingNetNote
Ayalon1,196.2135.9An insurer; a balance sheet of 24.3 billion, leverage of 13.5
Carmit152.48.22.6A gross margin of 20.7%
Levinstein Engineering145.019.5-3.0Operating positive, net negative
C-Lab48.4-6.9-6.1An operating loss
My Town32.90.2-2.3Right on the operating line
Baser Engineering5.66.33.9Operating higher than gross
Sola4.5-3.2A loss of NIS 68.24 per share
IDI Issuance10.60.0Negative equity

And at Levinstein Engineering there is a line worth noting: the loss attributable to shareholders, NIS 5.3 million, is larger than the total loss of NIS 3.0 million - that is, the minority recorded a profit while the shareholders lost.

The Three Extremes of the Day

ניטרלי

Three lines that show how wide the range is between companies filing on the same day.

The tax rate: from zero at Gilat Telecom - where net profit is identical to pre-tax profit - to 78.8% at Novolog. And in between, 8.6%, 10.8%, 16.7% and 72.3%.

The leverage ratio: from 1.07 at Arit Industries, whose liabilities come to about NIS 85.7 million only, to 9.4 at Prime Energy. And beyond that range, two companies with negative equity.

And financing as a share of operating profit: from 3.1% at Generation Capital to 252.7% at Prime Energy.

And that is the ratio that recurred today more than any other, and to my mind it is the most instructive: how much of the operating profit actually reaches the pre-tax line. It is computed from two figures that are always reported, and it separates the companies better than any margin.

הזווית שלי

דעה אישית של אילן אברמוב - לא ייעוץ ולא המלצה

After forty reports in a single day, what stays with me is not a particular company but a pattern.

In almost every report I read today, "net profit" was not the figure that described the quarter. At Shikun and Binui it was the result of a tax line that turned a loss into a profit. At Neto Holdings most of it belongs to partners. At Rani Zim it included a revaluation that is not cash. At Novolog it was about a thousandth of turnover.

And this is not a criticism of the companies - every one of those lines is entirely correct in accounting terms and disclosed in the report. It is a criticism of the habit of reading from the bottom up.

And the two lines that did hold across all forty reports are operating profit, and what happens to it on the way down. The first describes the business; the second describes the structure behind it.

And what this day gave, and nothing else can, is the comparison. Forty companies on the same day make it possible to see that margin survival ranged from 15% to 94%, and that it derives from the structure of the sector rather than from the quality of management. Dimri keeps 81% because it builds; Electra Consumer keeps 16% because it sells through a chain.

And what I take forward is that this ratio - and not the gross margin - is what I will check first in every report from here on.

(It is important to stress: this is my personal opinion only, and nothing herein constitutes a recommendation to take any action.)