CrowdStrike published its second-quarter fiscal 2027 report. Chief executive George Kurtz opened the release with the sentence "Q2 was the best quarter in CrowdStrike's history".
The number that justifies it is not revenue but net new ARR - and it did not merely rise, it accelerated.
Errors or inaccuracies are possible. Spotted something that looks wrong? Write to me and I will correct it.
What This Company Sells
CrowdStrike sells cyber security as a cloud service. Instead of installing antivirus software on every machine and running a central server, the customer installs a single software agent on endpoints - laptops, servers, virtual machines - and all the capability comes from the cloud.
And the business model is built on modules. That same installed agent can switch on more and more capabilities: endpoint protection, threat detection, cloud security, identity management, log management (SIEM) and more.
Which is what makes "module adoption" the central metric at this company.
| As at 31 July | Share of subscription customers |
|---|---|
| Six or more modules | 51% |
| Seven or more | 35% |
| Eight or more | 26% |
Because selling an additional module to an existing customer requires no new installation, no sales team winning an account, and no lengthy deployment. It is almost entirely margin.
And Falcon Flex is the commercial expression of that: a licensing model in which the customer commits to an amount and then draws modules from it as needed - instead of buying each product separately.
The Quarter
| $ millions | The quarter | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 1,470 | 1,170 | +26% |
| of which subscription | 1,400 | 1,100 | +27% |
| Net new ARR | 332.8 | +51% | |
| Total ARR | 5,840 | +25% | |
| Subscription gross margin, GAAP | 78% | 77% | |
| Operating profit, GAAP | -33.2 | -105.5 | |
| Operating income, non-GAAP | 371.6 | 255.0 | +46% |
| Net income, GAAP | 5.3 | -70.2 | |
| Earnings per share, non-GAAP | $0.31 | 0.23 | +35% |
| Operating cash flow | 530.3 | 332.8 | +59% |
| Free cash flow | 377.4 | 283.6 | +33% |
The line to stop on is net new ARR.
Guidance for the quarter was $285 million. The result: $332.8 million - a beat of about 17%.
And why that is the most important metric at a subscription company: quarterly revenue tells you what was sold in the past and recognised today. Net new ARR tells you how much new business was added in the quarter itself - after netting off customers who left or shrank.
And when it accelerates - from 25% growth in total ARR to 51% in the new addition - it means the rate of accumulation is rising, not just the base.
And Falcon Flex is the engine: ARR from accounts that adopted it passed $2.29 billion and grew 101%. That is about 39% of the company's total ARR.
And the Outlook That Was Raised
The company raised its full-year net new ARR growth outlook by 630 basis points, to 34% at the midpoint.
| Third quarter | Fiscal 2027 | |
|---|---|---|
| ARR | $6,184-6,188m | $6,603-6,612m |
| Revenue | $1,523-1,529m | $5,991-6,011m |
| Non-GAAP operating income | $373-376m | $1,497-1,508m |
| Non-GAAP EPS | $0.31 | $1.25-1.26 |
And chief financial officer Burt Podbere attributed the raise to "our strong Q2 results and record Q3 pipeline".
And What Has to Be Said From the Other Side
Operating profit under generally accepted accounting principles is still a loss: $33.2 million.
Non-GAAP operating income is $371.6 million.
The gap between them is about $405 million - which is 27.5% of the quarter's revenue.
And most of it is stock-based compensation. In the first six months of the year the company recorded $674.6 million of it, against $527.3 million a year earlier.
And this is not a technical note. Stock-based compensation is a real cost: it does not leave in cash, but it dilutes existing shareholders. The non-GAAP adjustments strip it out of profit - they do not strip it out of the share count.
Which explains the gap between the headlines: non-GAAP earnings per share of $0.31, against GAAP earnings of $0.01.
Both measures are correct. They simply answer different questions: one asks how much cash the business generates, the other asks how much of that is left for shareholders after paying employees in shares.
And still, the line that decides it for me is cash flow. Free cash flow of $377.4 million in the quarter, against $283.6 million a year earlier - and that is a number that tolerates no adjustments. The cash balance stands at $5.01 billion.
And a Small Israeli Acquisition That Entered the Report
The company announced an expanded collaboration with Schwarz Digits, and within it an agreement to acquire the technology assets of XM Cyber - a company providing attack path visualisation and offensive simulation.
The size of the deal does not appear in the release.
What I Will Check Next Quarter
| Net new ARR | Whether 51% is a point or a trend - guidance assumes 34% for the year |
| Falcon Flex | Whether 101% holds as the base grows |
| The GAAP to non-GAAP gap | 27.5% of revenue today - whether it narrows |
| Module adoption | 51% at six or more - the line that drives the margin |
| Free cash flow | $377 million in the quarter, and whether the pace holds |
הזווית שלי
דעה אישית של אילן אברמוב - לא ייעוץ ולא המלצה
This report is the exact opposite of the Salesforce one published at the same hour, which is why they are interesting read together.
At Salesforce earnings per share jumped 119% while operating profit did not move. Here operating profit under GAAP is still negative - while the business itself accelerates.
And what I take from that is that in software, more than in any other sector, the bottom line is an accounting choice rather than a fact. A company paying employees in shares will show a low profit; a company revaluing an investment portfolio will show a high one. In both cases, what happened to the business sits somewhere else entirely.
And at CrowdStrike that somewhere is net new ARR, and it accelerated to 51%. That is a number hard to flatter: it derives from contracts actually signed, net of those who left.
And what I hold as the question is actually the guidance. The company is raising its full-year growth outlook to 34%, after a quarter of 51%. That is, it does not itself assume this pace continues. The gap between 51% and 34% is what I will be looking for next quarter - whether it is conservatism, or a recognition that one quarter was exceptional.
And what does persuade me structurally is module adoption. When more than half of customers run six products on the same agent, the cost of selling the seventh is very low - and that is precisely the mechanism that allows growth without profitability eroding against it.
(It is important to stress: this is my personal opinion only, and nothing herein constitutes a recommendation to take any action.)
