The Real Game Is Against Yourself: Game Theory, Loss Aversion, and the Mistakes We All Make

An investor is willing to risk thousands on a stock - but not to spend a shekel on training that would help for life. He compares prices for an hour before buying a washing machine, but buys a stock because 'someone said so.' My angle, through a capital-markets lens: on investor psychology, loss aversion, and why time in the market beats timing the market.

By Ilan Abramov9 min read
The Real Game Is Against Yourself: Game Theory, Loss Aversion, and the Mistakes We All Make
My Angle · Through a Capital-Markets Lens

Before we dive in, a question: how much time did you spend last time choosing a washing machine? Probably an hour, maybe two. Comparing prices, reviews, maybe a call to a friend who knows. And now a second question: how much time did you spend before buying your last stock?

If the second answer is shorter than the first - and in most cases it is - you are not alone, and you are also not foolish. You are simply human. And that is exactly the problem, because the stock market is one of the few places where basic human logic works against us.

This article is not about a stock, not a sector and not a report. It is about the only player you are really up against in the market - yourself. And everything written here is my personal angle, from experience, and not advice or a recommendation.

Game Theory: Who You're Really Playing Against

In every trade in the market there are two sides. When you buy a stock, someone else is selling it to you - and they are just as convinced as you that they are making the right move. This is the starting point of game theory in the market: every action has another, thinking side that believes you are wrong.

This understanding alone should make us more humble. But what happens in practice is the opposite: most of us enter a trade with a feeling of absolute confidence, without asking even for a moment "wait, what does the other side know that I don't?" Instead of playing the game with a cool head, we let emotion play us.

And I want to start precisely with the observation that troubles me most. I have seen investors willing to risk thousands on a stock they heard about in a stairwell - but unwilling to spend a few hundred on training, a book or a course that would teach them how to read a report. Think how illogical that is: they are willing to put their money at the highest risk, but not to invest in the one thing that would lower that risk over time - knowledge. It is like buying a race car and refusing to take driving lessons.

And there is another picture that recurs for me again and again: the same person who does a thousand price comparisons before buying a 5,000-shekel washing machine - reading reviews, checking the warranty, consulting - that same person buys a 20,000-shekel stock because "someone said so," "I read somewhere," "I heard it's going up." On the washing machine he does research; on his financial future he relies on a rumor. The best investment I ever made was never in a stock. It was in the time I dedicated to understanding what I was doing.

Loss Aversion: Why the Pain Is Stronger Than the Pleasure

Here enters one of the most important findings in all of behavioral economics. In 1979, two psychologists, Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky, published "Prospect Theory" - work that earned Kahneman the Nobel Prize in Economics in 2002. Its central idea is simple and shattering: the pain we feel from a loss is psychologically about twice as strong as the pleasure we feel from a gain of the same size.

Think about it for a moment. If you find 1,000 shekels on the street, you are happy. If you lose 1,000 shekels, you suffer - and the suffering is about twice as strong as the joy. This is "loss aversion," and it is built deep into us, probably since cave-dweller days, when a loss of food was a matter of life and death.

The problem: this mechanism, which protected our ancestors, ruins us in the stock market. It makes us do exactly the wrong thing at both extremes:

  • In a loss - we hold a losing stock far too long, because realizing the loss hurts too much. We tell ourselves "it's only on paper, it will come back" - and that is called catching a falling knife.
  • In a gain - we rush to sell a winning stock, because the fear of losing the small gain we already have is stronger than the chance of a larger gain. We cut the flowers and water the weeds.

When Emotion Takes Over, Everything Goes Backwards

And here comes the part every investor knows, even if they will not admit it. You sit at home, calm, and plan an orderly strategy: "If the stock drops to X, I buy. If it rises to Y, I sell half." Everything is written down, logical, calculated.

And then the moment of truth arrives. The stock plunges, the screen is red, the stomach turns - and suddenly the whole strategy vanishes. Instead of buying as you planned, you freeze or, worse, sell in panic. Emotion took over, and the plan you wrote with a clear head was erased in one moment of fear.

We have all heard these lines, and maybe even said them: "I'm cursed, the moment I enter a stock everything falls," or "watch me sell - now it'll start rising." We laughed, but behind the joke hides a real problem. What is really happening is not a curse. It is that we buy exactly when everyone is excited (at the top, when the price is high) and sell exactly when everyone is scared (at the bottom, when the price is low). We are not unlucky - we are simply reacting to the herd's emotion, and so we do the exact opposite of what is needed.

When emotion comes in the door, logic goes out the window - unless you prepared it in advance. The professional investor is not the one who has no emotions, but the one who prepared enough to trust themselves when they arrive.

The most important thing I learned as an investor is that in the moment of truth I trust myself - but precisely because I prepared enough beforehand. That confidence does not come from the gut, it comes from the work: from a decision I made in advance, in a calm time, and from a written commitment to it. Whoever enters without preparation is left alone with the emotion against the red screen; whoever prepared enters that moment with a plan in hand. The plan is not for the good days - it is exactly for the moment when the gut is screaming, and you already know what to do.

The Figure That Ends the Debate: Time in the Market vs. Timing the Market

There is an eternal debate in the market: is it better to be invested all the time, or to "time" it - get in and out at the right moment? Emotion tells us to time: flee before the market drops, return before it rises. It sounds smart. The problem - the data says the opposite, and unequivocally.

Per data on the S&P 500 over the last 30 years or so: an investor who stayed invested the whole time earned on average about 10.7% a year. And someone who tried to time, and missed just the ten best days in the whole period? Their return plunged to about 5.6% - nearly half.

And why does this happen? Here is the real punch: the best days in the market come exactly when it is scariest. Per the data, a substantial part of the greenest days in history occurred within a bear market, or on days right next to the worst days. Whoever fled in panic after a red day - missed exactly the green surge that came after it.

This is why "time in the market beats timing the market" is not a slogan, but a mathematical conclusion. Trying to time requires being right twice - both on the exit and on the entry - and whoever tries usually misses the days that make all the difference.

So What Do You Actually Do? Experience Is Not a Shortcut

There is no magic here, and no shortcuts. But there are a few principles that experience teaches, and I believe in them:

First, invest in knowledge before investing money. Whoever understands what they are buying panics less when the price drops, because they know why they hold it. Knowledge is not an expense - it is your psychological safety cushion.

Second, build a plan in a calm time and commit to it. When to buy, how much, and when to sell - all written in advance, when the head is clear. This preparation is exactly what lets you trust yourself in the moment of truth: you are not deciding anew under pressure, you are executing a decision you already weighed carefully.

Third, understand that loss aversion is an enemy, not an advisor. When something inside is screaming at you to sell at a loss or cut a gain too soon - stop. It is likely the emotion talking, not the logic.

And fourth, let time work. Experience in the market is not measured by how fast you made money, but by how many mistakes you learned not to repeat. There is no substitute for time - not in the market, and not in learning.

Closing

The real game in the stock market was never against the market. It was always against ourselves - against the fear that makes us sell at the bottom, against the greed that makes us buy at the top, and against the loss aversion imprinted in us long before the exchange was invented.

The good news: this game can be learned to be won. Not by eliminating emotion - that is impossible - but by building a system, knowledge and discipline that will protect us from ourselves. And that, in the end, is the best investment you will make: not in the next stock, but in your ability to play the game with a cool head.

הניתוחים הכי טריים - באינסטגרם.

תובנות יומיות על השוק, רעיונות למחשבה ומענה לשאלות שלכם - כל יום, בסטוריז ובפוסטים.

@Ilan_abramov_